Japan: The Invoice Became the Credit
Japan has no e-invoicing mandate — yet since October 2023 the right to deduct consumption tax depends on a qualified invoice, and every electronic document must be kept electronically. The transitional rules changed on 1 October 2026, and a food-rate cut is before the Diet. This briefing explains where you stand, and what it means for SAP.
Country briefing · October 2026 · CFOs, tax and finance leads
Download Full Briefing (PDF, EN)Oct 2023
Qualified Invoice System in force — no qualified invoice, no full credit
70%
Credit on purchases from non-registered suppliers since 1 October 2026 — not 50%
JPY 100m
New yearly cap per non-registered supplier for that credit
10 · 8
Consumption tax rates today; a temporary 1% food rate is proposed
Key takeaway for finance and tax leaders: Japan has no format or platform mandate: what decides the credit is the content of the invoice, and since 1 October 2026 credit on purchases from non-registered suppliers is 70%, with a cap of JPY 100 million per supplier. Much published guidance still says 50%. The question this month: which percentage do your tax codes apply to those purchases today?
No Mandate — but the Invoice Decides the Credit
Japan took a different route from Europe. It did not mandate a format or a platform. It made the content of the invoice the condition for input credit, and it required electronic documents to be kept electronically. Peppol is available, and voluntary.
What Changed on 1 October 2026
| Rule | Before | From 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Credit on purchases from non-registered suppliers | 80% | 70% to September 2028 — the 50% step announced in 2023 was replaced |
| Cap per non-registered supplier | JPY 1 billion a year | JPY 100 million a year |
| End of the transition | September 2029 | September 2031, in steps of 70%, 50% and 30% |
| 20% special measure for small registrants | Available | Ending; a 30% measure for sole proprietors in 2027–28 |
Much Published Guidance Is Now Out of Date
Many guides and system configurations still say the credit drops to 50% on 1 October 2026. The 2026 tax reform, enacted in March 2026, set 70% instead, and added a lower cap per supplier. Check what your tax codes and purchase processes actually apply from this month.
Key Dates
Qualified Invoice System in force
Electronic data must be kept electronically
Credit 70%; JPY 100m cap per supplier
Peppol data protected from penalty increase
Food rate 1% — proposed
Three Obligations, One Invoice
- The Qualified Invoice System decides whether the buyer can deduct consumption tax.
- The Electronic Bookkeeping Act decides how electronic invoices must be stored.
- Peppol (JP PINT) offers a standard way to exchange them — voluntary, but increasingly rewarded.
Japan Compared with Europe
| Aspect | Japan | Typical EU mandate |
|---|---|---|
| Control point | The buyer’s right to credit | The issue of the invoice |
| Format | Any — paper, PDF or data | Structured data, often a set syntax |
| Authority sees invoices | Only at audit | In real time or by reporting |
| Peppol | Voluntary, government-backed | Mandatory in some countries |
Six Items, One Rounding Rule
A qualified invoice can only be issued by a business registered as a qualified invoice issuer. The buyer needs it — and its own books — to deduct consumption tax in full. It can be on paper or electronic.
Required Content
| No. | Required content | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Issuer’s name and registration number | “T” followed by 13 digits; for a company, its corporate number |
| 2 | Transaction date | Monthly summary invoices may show the period |
| 3 | Description of the goods or services | Items at the reduced rate must be marked |
| 4 | Total per tax rate, and the rate | Amounts grouped by 10% and 8% |
| 5 | Consumption tax per rate | Calculated on the total for each rate |
| 6 | Buyer’s name | Not needed on simplified invoices |
The Rounding Rule
Fractions of a yen are rounded once per tax rate, per invoice — not line by line. The issuer can choose to round up, down or to the nearest yen. An ERP that calculates tax per line and adds it up produces a different number, and an invoice that does not qualify.
Rounding, Illustrated
| Lines at 10% | Net | Tax per line, rounded down |
|---|---|---|
| Item A | 1,235 | 123 |
| Item B | 2,345 | 234 |
| Item C | 3,456 | 345 |
| Sum of line taxes | 7,036 | 702 — not compliant |
| Tax on the total, rounded once | 7,036 | 703 — compliant |
A one-yen difference — multiplied across thousands of invoices, and enough for a customer’s system to flag the invoice.
Variations
| Document | Rule |
|---|---|
| Simplified qualified invoice | Retail, restaurants, taxis: the buyer’s name may be left out, and either the tax or the rate shown |
| Qualified return invoice | Needed for refunds, rebates and discounts; not required below JPY 10,000 |
| Self-billed invoices | The buyer may prepare the qualified invoice, with the supplier’s confirmation |
Registration
- Registration is voluntary, but buyers lose credit when suppliers are not registered.
- A registered business must file consumption tax returns, even below the JPY 10 million threshold.
- Registration numbers can be checked on the National Tax Agency’s public site.
- Suppliers’ status must be recorded and kept current in the vendor master.
A Longer, Gentler Slope — and a New Cap
To soften the change for small suppliers, buyers may still deduct part of the tax on purchases from non-registered businesses. The 2026 tax reform, passed on 31 March 2026, slowed the slope and lowered the cap.
The Transitional Credit Schedule
| Purchases made | Credit allowed | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2023 – 30 Sep 2026 | 80% | Original first step |
| 1 Oct 2026 – 30 Sep 2028 | 70% | Was to be 50% under the 2023 rules |
| 1 Oct 2028 – 30 Sep 2030 | 50% | New step |
| 1 Oct 2030 – 30 Sep 2031 | 30% | New step |
| From 1 Oct 2031 | 0% | Transition ends |
From 1 October 2026 the transitional credit does not apply to purchases from one non-registered supplier above JPY 100 million a year, tax included — down from JPY 1 billion.
An Illustration
A purchase of JPY 1,100,000 including 10% tax from a non-registered supplier carries JPY 100,000 of tax. Until September the buyer could deduct JPY 80,000; from October, JPY 70,000. Across a large supplier base, that difference reaches the cost of goods every month.
Relief for Small Businesses
| Measure | Who and until when |
|---|---|
| 20% special measure | Registrants that would otherwise be exempt pay 20% of output tax — for periods to September 2026; sole proprietors to their 2026 return |
| 30% special measure (new) | Sole proprietors only, for 2027 and 2028 — claimed on the return; companies cannot use it |
| Small-amount relief | Purchases under JPY 10,000 need only the ledger entry — for businesses with base-period sales up to JPY 100 million, until September 2029 |
Purchases, by Supplier Status
| Supplier | Credit from 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Registered, with a qualified invoice | Full credit |
| Not registered | 70%, within JPY 100 million a year per supplier |
| Not registered, above the cap | No credit on the excess |
| Purchase under JPY 10,000, eligible buyer | Full credit on the ledger entry alone, until September 2029 |
What to Check This Month
Tax codes for non-registered purchases now need 70%, and later 50% and 30%; supplier spend must be monitored against the JPY 100 million cap; and every vendor’s registration status must be current — a supplier that registers moves from 70% to full credit.
If It Arrived Electronically, Keep It Electronically
Since 1 January 2024, documents exchanged electronically — invoices, orders, receipts sent by email, portal or EDI — must be kept in electronic form. Printing them and deleting the file is no longer allowed.
Requirements and How to Meet Them
| Requirement | How it can be met |
|---|---|
| Integrity | A timestamp; a system that logs or prevents changes and deletions; or internal rules against improper correction (the tax agency publishes a template) |
| Viewability | A display, printer and operating manuals available at an audit |
| Search | By transaction date, amount and counterparty |
| Search waiver | Sales up to JPY 50 million, or files organised by date and counterparty — if data can be downloaded on request |
What Counts as Electronic Transaction Data
| How the document arrived | Must be kept electronically? |
|---|---|
| PDF by email | Yes — the email attachment is the record |
| Downloaded from a supplier portal | Yes |
| EDI or Peppol message | Yes — the data itself |
| Paper, then scanned | Optional — scanning has its own rules if chosen |
The Grace Measure
Businesses that cannot meet the requirements for a reasonable cause — staff shortages, system delays — may keep the data without them, as long as they can produce the files and printouts at an audit. No application is needed, but the cause must be real.
Penalties and Incentives
- Penalty: heavy additional tax for concealment is increased by 10 points where electronic data is involved.
- From 1 January 2027: Peppol data linked to the books without tampering is excluded from that increase.
- From 1 January 2027: sole proprietors’ blue-return deduction rises to JPY 750,000.
Where the Act Meets SAP
Invoices received by email or through portals often live outside SAP — in mailboxes and shared drives. The act makes those files tax records. Linking them to the accounting document, with integrity and search, is usually the real project.
Common Gaps
- PDF invoices saved in personal mailboxes, not in a controlled store.
- No search by amount and counterparty across the archive.
- Internal correction rules adopted on paper, but never followed.
Voluntary, Standardised, Increasingly Rewarded
Japan has no e-invoicing mandate — not for business, government or consumers. The Digital Agency, Japan’s Peppol Authority since 2021, maintains a Japanese Peppol specification so that qualified invoices can be exchanged as data.
Specifications
| Specification | Use |
|---|---|
| Peppol BIS Standard Invoice JP PINT (v1.1.3, June 2026) | Qualified invoices between registered businesses |
| JP BIS Self-Billing Invoice | Invoices prepared by the buyer |
| JP BIS Invoice for non-registered businesses | Invoices from suppliers outside the system |
Why Companies Adopt It Without a Mandate
- Invoices arrive as data, with the rounding and rates already structured.
- Registration numbers can be checked automatically.
- Storage requirements are easier to meet than with PDFs.
- From 2027, linked Peppol data avoids the 10-point penalty increase.
Peppol or PDF?
| Aspect | PDF by email | Peppol (JP PINT) |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified invoice | Yes, if the content is right | Yes, with content checked by structure |
| Posting in accounts payable | Keyed or scanned | Imported as data |
| Storage rules | Integrity and search to organise | Easier to meet; protected from 2027 |
Adoption
Some government bodies, including the Digital Agency and the National Tax Agency, receive invoices over Peppol. There is no official count of users; small-business adoption remains limited.
Other Consumption Tax Points
| Topic | Position |
|---|---|
| Rates | 10% standard; 8% for food and non-alcoholic drinks (not eating in) and subscribed newspapers |
| Registration threshold | JPY 10 million of taxable sales |
| Digital platforms | Since April 2025, large designated platforms are liable for foreign suppliers’ digital services to consumers |
| From April 2028 | Low-value imports under JPY 10,000 become taxable; platform rules extend to goods |
Getting Started
Pick the flows
High-volume suppliers or customers already on Peppol.
Choose the access point
SAP’s own service through DRC, or a certified partner.
Map and test
JP PINT fields, rounding and registration numbers against SAP data.
Three Rates, Two Cut-Overs — If the Diet Agrees
In August 2026 the Cabinet adopted a policy to cut consumption tax on food, and in September a tax outline: from 1 April 2027 to 31 March 2029, food would be taxed at 1% instead of 8%. The bills went to the Diet session that opened on 5 October 2026. It is not yet law.
Timeline of the Proposal
Cabinet adopts the policy
Tax outline published
Bills before the Diet
1% food rate would start
Would end; 8% returns
Rates Today and Proposed
| Item | Today | Proposed, Apr 2027 – Mar 2029 |
|---|---|---|
| Food and non-alcoholic drinks | 8% | 1% |
| Takeaway food | 8% | 1% |
| Eating in, alcohol | 10% | 10% |
| Subscribed newspapers | 8% | 8% |
The government reportedly chose 1% rather than 0% because system changes are quicker. Dates and scope may change in the Diet.
What It Would Mean for Invoices and Systems
- Three rates at once — 10%, 8% and 1% — each with its own total and tax on the qualified invoice.
- Two cut-overs — on 1 April 2027 and back on 1 April 2029 — with returns and credits keeping the rate of the original supply.
- Purchases as well as sales: food buyers’ input tax changes too, including transitional credits on non-registered suppliers.
- Prices, point-of-sale systems and output forms all need the new rate in time for April.
Preparing Without Over-Committing
| Now | Once the law passes |
|---|---|
| Inventory affected products and flows | Create tax codes and condition records for 1% |
| Check invoice layouts for three rates | Test output, returns and credits across the cut-over |
| Plan the April 2027 cut-over window | Plan the April 2029 reversal at the same time |
Why This Matters Beyond Food Companies
Any business that buys food — canteens, hospitality, retail, events — will see 1% input tax on supplier invoices. Invoice matching and tax-code determination in accounts payable need the new rate as much as sales do.
Questions for Your Team
- Which of our products, purchases and outlets would move to 1%?
- Can our invoices and point-of-sale systems show three rates?
- Who owns the two cut-overs, and when do we freeze changes?
Rounding, Registration, Credit Percentages and Storage
Most of the SAP work in Japan is in finance, not in interfaces: tax codes, the vendor master, invoice output and storage.
Requirement, SAP and What to Watch For
| Requirement | In SAP | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Registration number | Stored on the business partner — your own for output, suppliers’ for credit | Suppliers not checked, or status not updated |
| Tax per rate, per invoice | Billing and invoice output configured to calculate totals by rate, with the chosen rounding | Line-level tax added up |
| Invoice layout | Output forms showing the six required items | Monthly summaries missing a field |
| Return invoices | Credit memos and rebates issued as qualified return invoices | Rebates outside billing |
| Transitional credit | Tax codes for 70%, then 50% and 30%; non-deductible part posted to cost | Codes still at 80% — or set to 50% |
| Supplier cap | A report of yearly spend per non-registered supplier | The JPY 100 million cap passed unnoticed |
Peppol and Storage
- SAP is a Digital Agency-certified Peppol service provider, through SAP Document and Reporting Compliance and its Peppol exchange service.
- SAP Concur supports Japanese Peppol invoices for expenses and invoices.
- No standard SAP product covers the bookkeeping act on its own — archiving, document management or certified partner tools usually do.
- Partners offer JP PINT add-ons for S/4HANA and SAP ERP 6.0.
Decisions to Take Now
- Which tax codes carry the 70% credit, and how the 2028 and 2030 steps will be switched.
- Who checks supplier registration, and how often the vendor master is refreshed.
- Where electronic invoices are stored, linked to which SAP documents.
- Whether to receive or send over Peppol, and with which partners first.
A Typical Project
Assess
Tax codes, vendor registration data, invoice output and storage.
Fix
Transitional codes and cap report; rounding and layout; supplier refresh.
Store
Electronic invoices linked to SAP documents, with integrity and search.
Plan
Food-rate cut-overs and the 2028 and 2030 credit steps on one calendar.
Confirm SAP Content for Your Release
SAP has delivered notes and guidance for the Qualified Invoice System, and partners have extended them. Check in SAP for Me which notes apply to your release — including any for the 2026 changes — before relying on standard behaviour.
Twelve Questions, and What a Poor Answer Costs
Each answer should rest on a number or a document. Anything answered with “it should be fine” is a finding.
The Twelve Questions
| No. | Question | If the answer is unclear |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do tax codes apply 70% since 1 October? | Credit over- or under-claimed every month |
| 2 | Is spend per non-registered supplier tracked against JPY 100m? | Credit claimed above the cap |
| 3 | Is supplier registration status current? | Full credit on non-qualified invoices |
| 4 | Is tax rounded once per rate per invoice? | Our invoices do not qualify for customers |
| 5 | Do our invoices show all six items? | Customers lose credit, then complain |
| 6 | Are rebates issued as return invoices? | Customers’ credit overstated |
| 7 | Are electronic invoices kept electronically? | Breach of the bookkeeping act |
| 8 | Can we search by date, amount and counterparty? | Audit requests we cannot answer |
| 9 | Are stored files linked to SAP documents? | Records that cannot be traced |
| 10 | Do we use, or plan to use, Peppol? | Missing the 2027 penalty protection |
| 11 | Are we ready for a 1% food rate? | A rushed cut-over in spring 2027 |
| 12 | Who tracks Japanese tax reform each year? | Learning about changes from audits |
Questions 1 to 3 are urgent this month: they decide how much tax you can deduct. Questions 4 to 6 protect your customers’ credit.
Week 1
- Tax codes for non-registered purchases
- Supplier cap report
Weeks 2–3
- Invoice layout and rounding
- Vendor registration refresh
Week 4
- Storage and search
- Food-rate plan
Three Figures to Ask For
| Figure | What a good answer looks like |
|---|---|
| Credit % applied to non-registered suppliers in October | 70% — and the tax codes to prove it |
| Largest yearly spend with one non-registered supplier | Known, and below JPY 100 million — or capped |
| Electronic invoices not linked to SAP | A small, falling number |
Scoring It Honestly
Japanese compliance looks finished because the 2023 go-live went well. The risk is in what changed since — the 2026 credit rules, storage and, possibly, a third rate.
An SAP Finance and Compliance Practice
Japan’s rules reward precision in finance processes more than technology projects. The gaps are in tax codes, vendor data and storage — and they move with every tax reform.
Japanese health check
Two to three weeks against section 08 — transitional credit, supplier cap, registration data, rounding, return invoices and storage. Output: a prioritised gap list.
Remediation and Peppol
Tax codes and reports for the 2026 rules, output forms, storage linked to SAP, and Peppol through SAP DRC where it pays. Output: credit claimed correctly, records defensible.
Run and tax reform
Each year’s reform applied on plan — the 2028 and 2030 steps, and the food rate if enacted. Output: a set-up that stays current.
What Makes This Different
We start from the credit. In Japan, that is where the money is.
We work in SAP finance. Tax codes, vendor master and output — not only interfaces.
We plan for reform. Japanese rules change every year; a design should expect it.
We say what we are not. We are not your Japanese tax adviser. We work alongside the people who are.
What a Health Check Produces
A credit position: tax codes, supplier registration and the cap, with the monthly effect quantified.
An output view: invoice content, rounding and return invoices against the six required items.
A storage view: where electronic invoices live, and whether integrity and search are met.
What to bring to the first conversation: your Japanese entities and SAP release, your tax codes for purchases, how supplier invoices arrive and are stored, and whether you sell or buy food.
A Sensible First Step
Ask for two numbers: input tax claimed on non-registered suppliers in October, at which percentage, and the largest yearly spend with a single non-registered supplier. Together they show whether the 2026 changes have reached your books.
Founder-led
Finance + SAP DRC depth
SAP DRC delivery: France and Germany
Boutique agility
Sources consulted 7 October 2026 — National Tax Agency guidance on the Qualified Invoice System, the Electronic Bookkeeping Act and the 2026 changes; Ministry of Finance on the 2026 tax reform; Digital Agency on Peppol and JP PINT; Yayoi, MoneyForward, Zeiken and other practitioner sources on the transitional measures; KPMG and BDO on platform taxation and 2028 changes; press and practitioner sources on the proposed food rate. SAP behaviour from SAP News Japan, SAP knowledge-base material and partner commentary.
Prepared by 30 Advisory (status at 7 October 2026). Information only — not tax, legal or accounting advice. It summarises publicly available material as at that date. The food-rate cut is a proposal before the Diet; SAP note coverage has not been verified for every release. Confirm the position for your own entity with the National Tax Agency or a qualified adviser before acting. 30 Advisory accepts no liability for decisions taken on the basis of this document.
Which Credit Percentage Do Your Tax Codes Apply?
We’ll measure the percentage applied to non-registered suppliers in October and your largest yearly spend with a single non-registered supplier in our free 60-minute diagnostic.
Three things to check first
- Whether your tax codes apply 70% to purchases from non-registered suppliers since October.
- Whether tax is rounded once per rate, per invoice.
- Whether received electronic invoices are kept electronically and linked to SAP.
Want the full picture? Score your DRC readiness →